If you're new hither, you may want to subscribe to my gratuitous Email alerts. Thanks for visiting!

A Citizen'Due south Analysis OF OBAMA'S LONG-FORM "Nascence Certificate"

by Tracey Chiliad. Grissom

This epitome was released past the White House on April 27, 2011 and described as a certified copy of Obama'due south original Hawaii birth certificate. It has been labeled a forgery past many examiners to date.

(May 14, 2011) — To be accurate, what we call a Long Class Nativity Certificate should probably be referred to as "the height portion" of a long form birth certificate. The Center for Affliction Control website informs the states: "Federal constabulary mandates national collection and publication of births." And then considering the Federal government mandates that information to be collected, they likewise create a standard grade for the states to use. In viewing the standard form, we encounter there is a cracking deal of data the infirmary collects (parent's race, details on the delivery, APGAR scores, aberrant conditions of the newborn, etc.) that we never get to encounter when requesting a re-create of our birth certificate.

In one case every ten to 15 years, the standard form undergoes a revision, and to date in that location have been xi such revisions of the standard nascency certificate, with the nearly recent occurring in 2003. The 2003 model is the one in use today and it replaced the 1989 standard form. This citizen researcher tried to figure out what revision might have been in use in Hawaii in 1961 merely couldn't find that information, although peradventure someone else tin can. It's complicated by the fact that when there is another revision, it takes the states a few years to completely switch over to the new form.  They have to impress and distribute them to the hospitals, and while some states seem to be quicker at information technology than others, others take a few years.

The records are used to compile statistics that provide indicators of growing social problems (for instance, broken families and births to unwed mothers), so the form changes according to the statistics which the The Centers for Illness Command (CDC) and National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS) need. In previous decades, whether children were born in an urban area or a remote, sparsely populated area may have been a major factor in infant expiry rates. So they ask detailed questions almost that. But in latter years the CDC and NCHS might make up one's mind the highest education levels attained by the parents is a major indicator of bug so they gather that data. Just as a side annotation, according to the Revised Standards for Classification of Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity issued past the Office of Management and Budget in 1997, mothers were to be offered the pick of selecting i or more racial designations. I had wondered why subsequently nascency certificates seen posted on the internet sometimes had an entire sentence of race classification where before ones had ane word.

More than data on revisions is constitute here : http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nvss/vital_certificate_revisions.htm

While my research hasn't completely answered all the questions I have concerning the long form birth document in use in 1961, I can draw some conclusions of what might be true with the latest edition to the growing "Obama Drove of Birth Certificates." For example, to the right of –#9 Race of Father– there's a marking that appears to be a penciled-in– handwritten number 9. Could it be a residual notation left over from when someone added a little note to remind himself (or someone else) of what exactly to type in that space? On the 2003 Revision under Father's Race, I count 14 different classifications plus *Other (Specify), making a total of 15. But in 1961 could there have been fewer with *Other (Specify), making number nine (9)? I think it's quite possible considering behind "Stanley Ann Dunham, Race of Mother –Caucasian" there appears to be a little penciled-in ane (1) and I'm fairly certain White or Caucasian has always in whatsoever American era been the beginning classification. In checking with the images of the Nordyke twins' nativity certificates, there likewise is what appears to exist a number (1) penciled in behind "Caucasian."

Another possibility that occurred to me is that the fiddling pencil notes might be an internal coding arrangement indicating which information needed further verification or guidance, peradventure something on a scale of 1 to ix meaning a 1 or ii is adequately certain, practically cocky-evident, but a 9 is raising red flags or uncertainties and needs more proof.

I also have ended by carefully looking at the Standard Form that all the discussion after the 2008 release of the Obama COLB near "Africa" is a continent and not a racial classification, while true, probably doesn't use considering the form states that the data taker is to check whichever box indicates what the father or mother considers themselves to be. Besides, the racial classifications employ to Americans filling out American documents (and accept been abused in the past to racially characterization people), but would they utilise to a foreign national here on a student visa? If you've had a risk to look at Obama Senior'due south clearing files yous probably noticed his race is listed as Africa or Kenya there too. If someone asks "what race are y'all?" and the respondent answers "Africa" –does the person taking the data take the legal right to make up one's mind something else? Not actually! Possibly change the reply "Africa" to "African" every bit seems to be the case with the latest Obama BC, merely probably goose egg more.

The more than I look at Obama's latest birth document, the more than I am inclined to think it retains items from a Standard Long Form Document of Live Nativity signed by his female parent at the time of his birth.  In other words, information technology's partially abstracted from an original source document. But if information technology couldn't be stamped with the straightforward "an exact and true copy" stamp, simply instead required the "this is a truthful copy or an abstract" stamp, it probably means –IT IS AN ABSTRACT. Patently and elementary, pieces taken from one original source certificate married to bits and pieces from another original source document to create a hybrid document reflecting what is true now.

Just beneath the surface it shows his female parent's signature beingness pasted together in two parts. Information technology'due south "(Stanley) Ann D" and then in a separate layer… unham Obama. Is information technology possible the Hawaii Department of Wellness had to slice that signature together to brand information technology comply with the new law constructive April one, 2011?

From the government website:

Offset Apr 1, 2011, the U.South. Section of Country will require the full names of the bidder's parent(southward) to be listed on all certified birth certificates to exist considered as primary testify of U.S. citizenship for all passport applicants, regardless of historic period. Certified birth certificates missing this data will non be acceptable as evidence of citizenship. This will not affect applications already in-process that have been submitted or accepted before the effective date.

Did his mother sign the standard birth grade (Stanley) Ann D. Obama, adding the Stanley as an after-thought? Is it possible that in club to comply with the in a higher place requirement and be able to certify information technology, HDOH could leave the (Stanley) Ann D part; that was fine, but it had to have "Dunham," non just "D," then they pulled the "unham Obama" from a later document?

On the internet Obama has quite the collection of birth certificates.  I wonder if he has an equal number of source documents in the secret hiding place in which Hawaii keeps his records? Maybe instead of calling him "The One," his supporters should call him "The Re-born One"? Only a Suggestion.